2023-07-12 15:00:12,447 INFO  [main] hbase.HBaseClassTestRule(94): Test class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision timeout: 13 mins
2023-07-12 15:00:12,751 WARN  [Time-limited test] impl.MetricsConfig(128): Cannot locate configuration: tried hadoop-metrics2-hbase.properties,hadoop-metrics2.properties
2023-07-12 15:00:12,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] metrics.MetricRegistriesLoader(60): Loaded MetricRegistries class org.apache.hadoop.hbase.metrics.impl.MetricRegistriesImpl
2023-07-12 15:00:12,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 15:00:12,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 15:00:12,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(147): before: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=12, OpenFileDescriptor=263, MaxFileDescriptor=60000, SystemLoadAverage=152, ProcessCount=160, AvailableMemoryMB=8726
2023-07-12 15:00:12,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 15:00:12,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 15:00:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 15:00:12,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=true, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 0.0 etc.
2023-07-12 15:00:13,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:13,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670296004=1, srv1026220091=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv670296004=1, srv1026220091=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1157709710=0, srv577073696=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1157709710=0, srv577073696=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2016754053=0, srv530791642=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2016754053=0, srv530791642=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv425590220=1, srv1703413330=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv425590220=1, srv1703413330=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv425590220=1, srv1703413330=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv442319196=1, srv1616321697=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv442319196=1, srv1616321697=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv442319196=1, srv1616321697=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv442319196=1, srv1616321697=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1267942866=1, srv114466830=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1893030008=0, srv619823669=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1171613398=0, srv841664819=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 15:00:13,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 15:00:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 15:00:13,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 15:00:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 15:00:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 15:00:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 15:00:13,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 15:00:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 15:00:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 15:00:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 15:00:13,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 15:00:13,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 15:00:13,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 15:00:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 15:00:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 15:00:13,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 15:00:13,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 15:00:13,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 15:00:13,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 15:00:13,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 15:00:13,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 15:00:13,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 15:00:13,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 15:00:13,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 15:00:13,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 15:00:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 15:00:13,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 15:00:13,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 15:00:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 15:00:13,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 15:00:13,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 15:00:13,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 15:00:13,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 15:00:13,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 15:00:13,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 15:00:13,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 15:00:13,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 15:00:13,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 15:00:13,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 15:00:13,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 15:00:13,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 15:00:13,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 15:00:13,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 15:00:13,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 15:00:13,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 15:00:13,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 15:00:13,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 15:00:13,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 15:00:13,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 15:00:13,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 15:00:13,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 15:00:13,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 15:00:13,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 15:00:13,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 15:00:13,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 15:00:13,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 15:00:13,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 15:00:13,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 15:00:13,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 15:00:13,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 15:00:13,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 15:00:13,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 15:00:13,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 15:00:13,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 15:00:13,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 15:00:13,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 15:00:13,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 15:00:13,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 15:00:13,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 15:00:13,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 15:00:13,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 15:00:13,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 15:00:13,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 15:00:13,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 15:00:13,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 15:00:13,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 15:00:13,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 15:00:13,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 15:00:13,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 15:00:13,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 15:00:13,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 15:00:13,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 15:00:13,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 15:00:13,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 15:00:13,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:13,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 15:00:13,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 15:00:13,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 15:00:13,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 15:00:13,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 15:00:13,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:13,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 15:00:13,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 15:00:13,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 15:00:13,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 15:00:13,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:13,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 15:00:13,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 15:00:13,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 15:00:13,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 15:00:13,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 15:00:13,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 15:00:13,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 15:00:13,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 15:00:13,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 15:00:13,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 15:00:13,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:13,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 15:00:13,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 15:00:13,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:13,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 15:00:13,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 15:00:13,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 15:00:13,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 15:00:13,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 15:00:13,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:13,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 15:00:13,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:13,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 15:00:13,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 15:00:13,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 15:00:13,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:13,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 15:00:13,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 15:00:13,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 15:00:13,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 15:00:13,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 15:00:13,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 15:00:13,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 15:00:13,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 15:00:13,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 15:00:13,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 15:00:13,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 15:00:13,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1692402520=0, srv363710161=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:13,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:13,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv861282054=1, srv2097461995=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853731936=2, srv658157760=1, srv423784220=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv853731936=2, srv658157760=1, srv423784220=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25373573=1, srv724820007=2, srv1274796157=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25373573=1, srv724820007=2, srv1274796157=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv25373573=1, srv724820007=2, srv1274796157=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv438820538=2, srv1970498567=1, srv1319959807=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv438820538=2, srv1970498567=1, srv1319959807=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1106023643=0, srv1734379030=1, srv784037590=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1106023643=0, srv1734379030=1, srv784037590=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1106023643=0, srv1734379030=1, srv784037590=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2058164055=2, srv1756308183=1, srv1000981592=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2058164055=2, srv1756308183=1, srv1000981592=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2058164055=2, srv1756308183=1, srv1000981592=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2058164055=2, srv1756308183=1, srv1000981592=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:13,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1981895814=1, srv269009248=2, srv1363227596=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1991352341=2, srv1025182649=0, srv1694060467=1, srv640519749=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1991352341=2, srv1025182649=0, srv1694060467=1, srv640519749=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1991352341=2, srv1025182649=0, srv1694060467=1, srv640519749=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv413072509=2, srv596029006=3, srv1315761343=0, srv292181003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv413072509=2, srv596029006=3, srv1315761343=0, srv292181003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv413072509=2, srv596029006=3, srv1315761343=0, srv292181003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv413072509=2, srv596029006=3, srv1315761343=0, srv292181003=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv389883897=3, srv1230433707=0, srv178042914=1, srv22814514=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv389883897=3, srv1230433707=0, srv178042914=1, srv22814514=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv389883897=3, srv1230433707=0, srv178042914=1, srv22814514=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv389883897=3, srv1230433707=0, srv178042914=1, srv22814514=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv389883897=3, srv1230433707=0, srv178042914=1, srv22814514=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv769550840=3, srv1136717917=0, srv1711343395=2, srv1377594107=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv109090114=0, srv1257197913=2, srv299423237=3, srv120562903=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1376271761=0, srv1514498371=1, srv712805767=2, srv901768464=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2085536325=2, srv1779815700=0, srv957937187=3, srv1914890888=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv634113724=3, srv573223702=2, srv1195025057=1, srv119140499=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv504546442=1, srv543192767=2, srv908890200=3, srv1160430119=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1451318046=1, srv35872892=2, srv1113154457=0, srv571242953=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv890674119=4, srv684597157=3, srv1255090431=1, srv1776972219=2, srv1186386435=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv890674119=4, srv684597157=3, srv1255090431=1, srv1776972219=2, srv1186386435=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv890674119=4, srv684597157=3, srv1255090431=1, srv1776972219=2, srv1186386435=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv890674119=4, srv684597157=3, srv1255090431=1, srv1776972219=2, srv1186386435=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 15:00:13,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 15:00:13,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 15:00:13,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 15:00:13,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,874 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,876 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 15:00:13,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 15:00:13,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 15:00:13,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 15:00:13,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 15:00:13,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 15:00:13,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 15:00:13,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 15:00:13,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 15:00:13,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 15:00:13,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 15:00:13,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:13,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 15:00:14,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 15:00:14,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 15:00:14,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 15:00:14,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 15:00:14,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 15:00:14,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 15:00:14,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 15:00:14,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 15:00:14,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 15:00:14,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 15:00:14,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:14,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-12 15:00:14,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 15:00:14,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 15:00:14,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-12 15:00:14,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 15:00:14,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-12 15:00:14,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:14,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-12 15:00:14,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-12 15:00:14,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 15:00:14,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:14,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 15:00:14,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 15:00:14,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 15:00:14,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 15:00:14,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 15:00:14,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 15:00:14,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 15:00:14,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 15:00:14,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 15:00:14,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 15:00:14,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 15:00:14,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:14,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:14,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:14,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:14,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 15:00:14,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 15:00:14,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 15:00:14,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 15:00:14,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 15:00:14,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 15:00:14,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:14,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-12 15:00:14,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:14,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:14,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-12 15:00:14,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 15:00:14,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 15:00:14,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-12 15:00:14,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 15:00:14,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 15:00:14,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 15:00:14,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 15:00:14,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 15:00:14,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 15:00:14,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 15:00:14,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv668459762=4, srv752004367=5, srv2071128489=1, srv525699284=3, srv435313117=2, srv205020352=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1380
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1381
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table880
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table880) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1140
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1382
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table881
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table881) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1141
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1383
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table640
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table640) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table882
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table882) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1142
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1384
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table641
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table641) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table883
2023-07-12 15:00:14,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table883) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1143
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1385
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table400
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table642
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table642) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table884
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table884) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1144
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1386
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table401
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table643
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table643) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table885
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table885) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1145
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1387
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table402
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table644
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table644) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table886
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table886) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table403
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table645
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table645) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table887
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table887) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table404
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table646
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table646) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table888
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table888) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table405
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table647
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table647) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table889
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table889) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table406
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table648
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table648) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table407
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table649
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table649) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table408
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table409
2023-07-12 15:00:14,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1146
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1388
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1147
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1389
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1148
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1149
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1370
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1371
2023-07-12 15:00:14,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table870
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table870) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1130
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1372
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table871
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table871) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1131
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1373
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table630
2023-07-12 15:00:14,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table630) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table872
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table872) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1132
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1374
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table631
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table631) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table873
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table873) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1133
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1375
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table632
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table632) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table874
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table874) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1134
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1376
2023-07-12 15:00:14,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table633
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table633) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table875
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table875) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table634
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table634) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table876
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table876) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table635
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table635) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table877
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table877) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table636
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table636) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table878
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table878) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table637
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table637) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table879
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table879) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table638
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table638) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table639
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table639) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1135
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1377
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1136
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1378
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1137
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1379
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1138
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1139
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table660
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table660) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1360
2023-07-12 15:00:14,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table661
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table661) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1361
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,528 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table420
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table662
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table662) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1120
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1362
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table421
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table663
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table663) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1121
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1363
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table422
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table664
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table664) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1122
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1364
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table423
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table665
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table665) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1123
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1365
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table424
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table666
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table666) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table425
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table667
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table667) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table426
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table668
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table668) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table427
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table669
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table669) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table428
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table429
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1124
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1366
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1125
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1367
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1126
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1368
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1127
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1369
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1128
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1129
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table890
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table890) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table891
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table891) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table650
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table650) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table892
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table892) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1350
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table651
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table651) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table893
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table893) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1351
2023-07-12 15:00:14,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table410
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table652
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table652) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table894
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table894) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1110
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1352
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table411
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table653
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table653) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table895
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table895) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1111
2023-07-12 15:00:14,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1353
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table412
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table654
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table654) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table896
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table896) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1112
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1354
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table413
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table655
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table655) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table897
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table897) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table414
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table656
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table656) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table898
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table898) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table415
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table657
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table657) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table899
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table899) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table416
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table658
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table658) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table417
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table659
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table659) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table418
2023-07-12 15:00:14,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table419
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1113
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1355
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1114
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1356
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1115
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1357
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1116
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1358
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1117
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1359
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1118
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1119
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1182
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1183
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1184
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1185
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1186
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1187
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table840
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table840) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1188
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table841
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table841) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1189
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table600
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table600) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table842
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table842) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table601
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table601) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table843
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table843) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table602
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table602) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table844
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table844) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table603
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table603) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table845
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table845) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table604
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table604) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table846
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table846) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table605
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table605) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table847
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table847) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table606
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table606) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table848
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table848) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1180
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table607
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table607) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table849
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table849) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1181
2023-07-12 15:00:14,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table608
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table608) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table609
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table609) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1171
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1172
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1173
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1174
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1175
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1176
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1177
2023-07-12 15:00:14,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table830
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table830) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1178
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table831
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table831) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table832
2023-07-12 15:00:14,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table832) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table833
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table833) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table834
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table834) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table835
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table835) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table836
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table836) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table837
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table837) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table838
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table838) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1170
2023-07-12 15:00:14,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table839
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table839) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1179
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1160
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1161
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1162
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1163
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table860
2023-07-12 15:00:14,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table860) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1164
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table861
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table861) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1165
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table620
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table620) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table862
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table862) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1166
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table621
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table621) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table863
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table863) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1167
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table622
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table622) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table864
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table864) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table623
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table623) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table865
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table865) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table624
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table624) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table866
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table866) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table625
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table625) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table867
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table867) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table626
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table626) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table868
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table868) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table627
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table627) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table869
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table869) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table628
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table628) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table629
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table629) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1168
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1169
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1391
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1150
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1392
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1151
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1393
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1152
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1394
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1153
2023-07-12 15:00:14,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1395
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table850
2023-07-12 15:00:14,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table850) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1154
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1396
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table851
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table851) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1155
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1397
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table610
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table610) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table852
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table852) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1156
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1398
2023-07-12 15:00:14,611 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table611
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table611) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table853
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,612 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table853) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table612
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table612) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table854
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,613 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table854) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table613
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table613) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table855
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,614 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table855) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table614
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table614) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table856
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,615 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table856) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table615
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table615) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table857
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table857) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,616 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table616
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table616) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table858
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table858) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table617
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,617 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table617) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table859
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table859) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table618
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,618 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table618) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1390
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table619
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table619) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,619 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1157
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1399
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1158
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1159
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table240
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,621 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table482
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table241
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table483
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table242
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,623 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table484
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table243
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,624 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table485
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table244
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,625 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table486
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table245
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,626 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table487
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table246
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table488
2023-07-12 15:00:14,627 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table247
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table489
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,628 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table248
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table249
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,629 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1308
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1309
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,630 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1300
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1301
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1302
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1303
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1304
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,632 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table490
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1305
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,633 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table491
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1306
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,634 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table250
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table492
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1307
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table471
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table230
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table472
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table231
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table473
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table232
2023-07-12 15:00:14,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table474
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table233
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table475
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table234
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table476
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table235
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,641 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table477
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table236
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table478
2023-07-12 15:00:14,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table237
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,643 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table479
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table238
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table239
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table480
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,645 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table481
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table262
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table263
2023-07-12 15:00:14,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table264
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table265
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table266
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table267
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table268
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table269
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table270
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table271
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table272
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table251
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table493
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table252
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table494
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table253
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table495
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table254
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,654 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table496
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table255
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table497
2023-07-12 15:00:14,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table256
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table498
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table257
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table499
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table258
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table259
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table260
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table261
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table680
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table680) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table681
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table681) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table440
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table682
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table682) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table441
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table683
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table683) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table200
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table442
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table684
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table684) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,664 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1340
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table201
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table443
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table685
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table685) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1341
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table202
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,667 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table444
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,668 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table686
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table686) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1100
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1342
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table203
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table445
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table687
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table687) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1101
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1343
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table204
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table446
2023-07-12 15:00:14,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table688
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table688) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table205
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table447
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table689
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table689) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table206
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table448
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,675 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table207
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table449
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table208
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table209
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1102
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1344
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1103
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1345
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1104
2023-07-12 15:00:14,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1346
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1105
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1347
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1106
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1348
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1107
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1349
2023-07-12 15:00:14,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1108
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table690
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table690) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1109
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table670
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table670) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table671
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table671) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table430
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table672
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table672) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table431
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table673
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table673) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table432
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table674
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table674) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1330
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,688 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table433
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table675
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table675) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1331
2023-07-12 15:00:14,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table434
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table676
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table676) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1332
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table435
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table677
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table677) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table436
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,692 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table678
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table678) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table437
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table679
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table679) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table438
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table439
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1333
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1334
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1335
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1336
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1337
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1338
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1339
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table460
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table461
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table220
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table462
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table221
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table463
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table222
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table464
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table223
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table465
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table224
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table466
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1320
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table225
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table467
2023-07-12 15:00:14,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1321
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table226
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table468
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table227
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table469
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,707 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table228
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table229
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1322
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1323
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1324
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1325
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1326
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,710 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1327
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1328
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table470
2023-07-12 15:00:14,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1329
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table691
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table691) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table450
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table692
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table692) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table451
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table693
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table693) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table210
2023-07-12 15:00:14,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table452
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table694
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table694) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table211
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,716 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table453
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table695
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table695) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table212
2023-07-12 15:00:14,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table454
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table696
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table696) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table213
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table455
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table697
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table697) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table214
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table456
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table698
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table698) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1310
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table215
2023-07-12 15:00:14,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table457
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table699
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table699) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table216
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table458
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table217
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table459
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,725 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table218
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table219
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1319
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1311
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1312
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1313
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1314
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1315
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1316
2023-07-12 15:00:14,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1317
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1318
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table196
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table197
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table198
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table199
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,732 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table163
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table163) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table164
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table164) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table165
2023-07-12 15:00:14,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table165) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table166
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table166) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table167
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table167) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table168
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table168) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table169
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table169) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table170
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table170) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table171
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table171) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table172
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table172) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table173
2023-07-12 15:00:14,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table173) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table394
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table394) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table395
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table395) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table396
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table396) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table155
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table155) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table397
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table397) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table156
2023-07-12 15:00:14,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table156) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table398
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table398) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table157
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table157) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table399
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table399) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table158
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table158) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table159
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table159) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table160
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table160) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table161
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table161) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table162
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table162) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table185
2023-07-12 15:00:14,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table185) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table186
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table186) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table187
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table187) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table188
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table188) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table189
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table189) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table190
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,748 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table191
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table192
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table193
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table194
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table195
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table174
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table174) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table175
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table175) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table176
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table176) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table177
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table177) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table178
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table178) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table179
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table179) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,753 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table180
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table180) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table181
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table181) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table182
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table182) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table183
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table183) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table184
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table184) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table800
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table800) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table801
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table801) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table802
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table802) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table803
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table803) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table804
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table804) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table805
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table805) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table806
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table806) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table807
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table807) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,760 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table808
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table808) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table809
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table809) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table820
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table820) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table821
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table821) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table822
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table822) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table823
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table823) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table824
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table824) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table825
2023-07-12 15:00:14,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table825) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table826
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table826) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table827
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table827) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table828
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table828) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table829
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table829) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1193
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1193) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1194
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1194) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1195
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1195) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,769 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1196
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1196) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1197
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,770 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1197) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1198
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1198) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1199
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1199) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table810
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table810) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table811
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table811) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table812
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table812) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table813
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table813) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table814
2023-07-12 15:00:14,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table814) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1190
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1190) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table815
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table815) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1191
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1191) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table816
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table816) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1192
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1192) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table817
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table817) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table818
2023-07-12 15:00:14,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table818) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table819
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table819) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1260
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1260) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1261
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1261) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table760
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table760) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1020
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1020) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1262
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1262) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table761
2023-07-12 15:00:14,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table761) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1021
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1021) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1263
2023-07-12 15:00:14,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1263) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table520
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,781 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table520) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table762
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table762) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1022
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1022) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1264
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1264) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table521
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table521) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table763
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table763) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1023
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1023) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1265
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,784 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1265) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table522
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table522) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table764
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table764) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1024
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1024) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1266
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1266) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table523
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table523) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table765
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table765) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table524
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table524) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table766
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table766) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table525
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table525) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table767
2023-07-12 15:00:14,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table767) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table526
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table526) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table768
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table768) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table527
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table527) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table769
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table769) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table528
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table528) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table529
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table529) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1025
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1025) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1267
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1267) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:14,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1026
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1026) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1268
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1268) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1027
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1027) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1269
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1269) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,797 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1028
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1028) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1029
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1029) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1490
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1490) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1491
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1491) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table990
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table990) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1250
2023-07-12 15:00:14,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1250) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1492
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1492) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table991
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table991) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1251
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1251) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1493
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1493) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table750
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table750) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table992
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table992) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1010
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1010) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1252
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1252) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1494
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1494) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table751
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table751) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table993
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,806 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table993) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1011
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1011) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1253
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1253) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1495
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1495) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table510
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table510) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table752
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table752) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table994
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table994) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1012
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,809 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1012) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1254
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1254) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1496
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1496) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table511
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table511) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table753
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table753) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table995
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table995) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1013
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1013) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1255
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1255) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1497
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1497) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table512
2023-07-12 15:00:14,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table512) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table754
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table754) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table996
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table996) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table513
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table513) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table755
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table755) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table997
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table997) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table514
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table514) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table756
2023-07-12 15:00:14,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table756) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table998
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table998) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table515
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table515) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table757
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table757) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table999
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table999) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table516
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table516) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table758
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table758) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table517
2023-07-12 15:00:14,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table517) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table759
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,820 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table759) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table518
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table518) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table519
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table519) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:14,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1014
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1014) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1256
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1256) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1498
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1498) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,824 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1015
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1015) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1257
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1257) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1499
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1499) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1016
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1016) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1258
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1258) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,827 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1017
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1017) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1259
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1259) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1018
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1018) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1019
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1019) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table780
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table780) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1480
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1480) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,832 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table781
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table781) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1481
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1481) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table540
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table540) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table782
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table782) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1240
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1240) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1482
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1482) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table541
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table541) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,835 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table783
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table783) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1241
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1241) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1483
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1483) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table300
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table300) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table542
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table542) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table784
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table784) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1000
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1000) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,838 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1242
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1242) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1484
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1484) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,839 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table301
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table301) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table543
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table543) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table785
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table785) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1001
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1001) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1243
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1243) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1485
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1485) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table302
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,842 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table302) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table544
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table544) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table786
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table786) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1002
2023-07-12 15:00:14,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1002) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1244
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1244) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1486
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1486) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table303
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table303) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table545
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table545) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table787
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table787) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table304
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table304) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table546
2023-07-12 15:00:14,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table546) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table788
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table788) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table305
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table305) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table547
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table547) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table789
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table789) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table306
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table306) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table548
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table548) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table307
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table307) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table549
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,850 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table549) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table308
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table308) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table309
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table309) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,851 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1003
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1003) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1245
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1245) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1487
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1487) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1004
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1004) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,854 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1246
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1246) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1488
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1488) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1005
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1005) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1247
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1247) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1489
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1489) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,857 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1006
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1006) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1248
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1248) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1007
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1007) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,859 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1249
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1249) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1008
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1008) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1009
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1009) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table770
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table770) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1470
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1470) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table771
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table771) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1471
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1471) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table530
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table530) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table772
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table772) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1230
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1230) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1472
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1472) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,866 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table531
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table531) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table773
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table773) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1231
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1231) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1473
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1473) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table532
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table532) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table774
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table774) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1232
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1232) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1474
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1474) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,877 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table533
2023-07-12 15:00:14,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table533) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table775
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table775) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1233
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1233) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,879 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1475
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1475) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table534
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table534) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table776
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,881 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table776) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table535
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table535) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table777
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table777) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table536
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table536) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table778
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table778) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table537
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table537) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table779
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table779) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table538
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table538) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table539
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table539) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1234
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1234) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1476
2023-07-12 15:00:14,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1476) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1235
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,890 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1235) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1477
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1477) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1236
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1236) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1478
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1478) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1237
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1237) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1479
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1479) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1238
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1238) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1239
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1239) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:14,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1061
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1061) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,900 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1062
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1062) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1063
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1063) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1064
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1064) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,902 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1065
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1065) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table960
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table960) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1066
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1066) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table961
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table961) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1067
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1067) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table720
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table720) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table962
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table962) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1068
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1068) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table721
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,906 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table721) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table963
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table963) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table722
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table722) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table964
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table964) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table723
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table723) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table965
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table965) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table724
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table724) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table966
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table966) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table725
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,909 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table725) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table967
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table967) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table726
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table726) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table968
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table968) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table727
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table727) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table969
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table969) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table728
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table728) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1060
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1060) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table729
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,912 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table729) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1069
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1069) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1050
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1050) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,913 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1292
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1051
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1051) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1293
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1052
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1052) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1294
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1053
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1053) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1295
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1054
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1054) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1296
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1055
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1055) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1297
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table950
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table950) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1056
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1056) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1298
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table951
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table951) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1057
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,919 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1057) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1299
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table710
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table710) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table952
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table952) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table711
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table711) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table953
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table953) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table712
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table712) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table954
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table954) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table713
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table713) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table955
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table955) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table714
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table714) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table956
2023-07-12 15:00:14,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table956) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table715
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table715) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table957
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table957) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table716
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table716) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table958
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table958) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1290
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table717
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table717) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table959
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table959) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1291
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table718
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table718) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table719
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,927 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table719) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1058
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1058) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1059
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1059) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1281
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1040
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1040) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1282
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1041
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1041) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1283
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table980
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table980) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1042
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1042) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1284
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,931 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table981
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table981) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1043
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1043) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1285
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table740
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table740) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table982
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table982) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1044
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1044) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1286
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table741
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table741) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table983
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table983) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1045
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,935 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1045) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1287
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table500
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table500) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table742
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table742) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table984
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table984) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1046
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1046) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1288
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table501
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table501) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table743
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table743) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table985
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table985) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table502
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table502) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,939 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table744
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table744) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table986
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table986) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table503
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table503) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table745
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table745) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table987
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table987) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table504
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table504) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table746
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table746) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table988
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table988) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,942 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table505
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table505) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table747
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table747) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table989
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table989) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table506
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table506) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table748
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table748) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table507
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table507) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table749
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table749) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table508
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table508) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,945 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1280
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table509
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table509) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1047
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1047) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1289
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1048
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1048) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,947 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1049
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1049) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1270
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1270) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1271
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1271) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1030
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1030) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1272
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1272) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1031
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1031) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1273
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table970
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,950 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table970) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1032
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1032) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1274
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table971
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table971) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1033
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1033) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1275
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table730
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table730) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table972
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table972) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1034
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1034) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1276
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table731
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table731) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table973
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table973) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1035
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1035) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1277
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table732
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table732) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table974
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table974) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table733
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table733) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table975
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table975) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table734
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table734) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,957 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table976
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table976) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table735
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table735) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table977
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table977) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table736
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table736) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table978
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table978) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table737
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table737) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table979
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table979) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table738
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table738) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table739
2023-07-12 15:00:14,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table739) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1036
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1036) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1278
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1037
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1037) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1279
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1038
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1038) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1039
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1039) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table361
2023-07-12 15:00:14,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table361) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table362
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table362) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table363
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table363) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table364
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,967 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table364) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table365
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table365) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table366
2023-07-12 15:00:14,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table366) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table367
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table367) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table368
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table368) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1420
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1420) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,972 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table369
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table369) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:14,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1429
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1429) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1421
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1421) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1422
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1422) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1423
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1423) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1424
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1424) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1425
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1425) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1426
2023-07-12 15:00:14,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1426) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table370
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table370) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1427
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1427) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table371
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table371) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1428
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1428) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table350
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,979 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table350) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table592
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table592) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table351
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table351) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table593
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table593) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table352
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,981 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table352) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table594
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table594) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table353
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table353) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table595
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table595) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table354
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table354) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table596
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table596) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table355
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table355) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table597
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table597) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:14,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table356
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table356) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table598
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table598) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table357
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table357) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table599
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table599) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table358
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table358) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:14,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table359
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table359) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1418
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1418) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1419
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1419) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1410
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1410) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1411
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1411) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1412
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1412) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1413
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1413) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1414
2023-07-12 15:00:14,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1414) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1415
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1415) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1416
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1416) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table360
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table360) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1417
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1417) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table383
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table383) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,995 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table384
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table384) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table385
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table385) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table386
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table386) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table387
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table387) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,998 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table388
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table388) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:14,999 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table389) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,000 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1407
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,001 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1407) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1408
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1408) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,002 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1409
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1409) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,003 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1400
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1400) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1401
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1401) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1402
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1402) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table390) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1403
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1403) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table391) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,007 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1404
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1404) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table392) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1405
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1405) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,009 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table393
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table393) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1406
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1406) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table372) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table373) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table374) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table375) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,014 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table376) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table377) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table378) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table379) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table380) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table381) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table382) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table560
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table560) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table561
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table561) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table320) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table562
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table562) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1460
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1460) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table321) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table563
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table563) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1461
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1461) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table322) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table564
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table564) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1220) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1462
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1462) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table323) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table565
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table565) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1221) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1463
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1463) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table324) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table566
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table566) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1222) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1464
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1464) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table325) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table567
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table567) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table326) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table568
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table568) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table327) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table569
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table569) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table328) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table329) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1223) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1465
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1465) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1224) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1466
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1466) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1225) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1467
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1467) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1226) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1468
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1468) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1227) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1469
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1469) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1228) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1229) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table790
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table790) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table791
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table791) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table550
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table550) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table792
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table792) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table551
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table551) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table793
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table793) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table310) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table552
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table552) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table794
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table794) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1450
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1450) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table311) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table553
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table553) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table795
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table795) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1451
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1451) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table312) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,046 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table554
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table554) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table796
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table796) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1210) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1452
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1452) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table313) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table555
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table555) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table797
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table797) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1211) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,049 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1453
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1453) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table314) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table556
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table556) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table798
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table798) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table315) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table557
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table557) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table799
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table799) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table316) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table558
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table558) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table317) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table559
2023-07-12 15:00:15,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table559) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table318) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table319) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1212) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1454
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1454) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1213) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1455
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1455) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1214) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1456
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1456) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1215) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1457
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1457) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1216) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1458
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1458) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1217) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1459
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1459) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,061 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1218) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1219) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table581
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table581) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table340) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table582
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table582) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table341) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table583
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table583) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table342) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table584
2023-07-12 15:00:15,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table584) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table343) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table585
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table585) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table344) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table586
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table586) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1440
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1440) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table345) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table587
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table587) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1441
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1441) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table346) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table588
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table588) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1200) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1442
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1442) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,073 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table347) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table589
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table589) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table348) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table349) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1209) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1201) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1443
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1443) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1202) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1444
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1444) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1203) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1445
2023-07-12 15:00:15,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1445) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1204) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1446
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1446) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1205) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1447
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1447) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1206) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1448
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1448) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table590
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table590) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1207) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,084 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1449
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1449) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table591
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table591) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1208) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table570
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table570) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table571
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table571) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table330) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table572
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table572) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table331) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table573
2023-07-12 15:00:15,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table573) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table332) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table574
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table574) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table333) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table575
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table575) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table334) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,092 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table576
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table576) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1430
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1430) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table335) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table577
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table577) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1431
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1431) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table336) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table578
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table578) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table337) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table579
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table579) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table338) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,096 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table339) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1432
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1432) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1433
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1433) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1434
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1434) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1435
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1435) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1436
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1436) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,099 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1437
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1437) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1438
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1438) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table580
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,101 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table580) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1439
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1439) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table284) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table285) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table286) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table287) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table288) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table289) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table290) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table291) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table292) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,105 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table293) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table294) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table273) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table274) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table275) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table276) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table277) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,108 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table278) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table279) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table280) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table281) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table282) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table283) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table295) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table296) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table297) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table298) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table299) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table920
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table920) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table921
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table921) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table922
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table922) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table923
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table923) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table924
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table924) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table925
2023-07-12 15:00:15,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table925) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table926
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table926) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table927
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table927) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table928
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table928) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table929
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table929) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1094
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1094) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1095
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1095) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1096
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1096) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1097
2023-07-12 15:00:15,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1097) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1098
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1098) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1099
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,118 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1099) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table910
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table910) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table911
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,119 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table911) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table912
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table912) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1090
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1090) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table913
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table913) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1091
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1091) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table914
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table914) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1092
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1092) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table915
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table915) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1093
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1093) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,122 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table916
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table916) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table917
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table917) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table918
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table918) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table919
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table919) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1083
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1083) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1084
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1084) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1085
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1085) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1086
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1086) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1087
2023-07-12 15:00:15,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1087) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1088
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1088) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1089
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1089) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table940
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table940) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table941
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,127 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table941) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table700
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table700) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table942
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table942) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table701
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table701) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table943
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table943) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table702
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table702) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table944
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table944) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table703
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table703) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table945
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table945) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,130 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table704
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table704) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table946
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table946) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1080
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1080) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table705
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table705) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table947
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table947) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1081
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1081) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table706
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table706) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table948
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table948) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1082
2023-07-12 15:00:15,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1082) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table707
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table707) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table949
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table949) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table708
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table708) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table709
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table709) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,135 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1072
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1072) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1073
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1073) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1074
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1074) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1075
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1075) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1076
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1076) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1077
2023-07-12 15:00:15,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1077) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1078
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1078) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1079
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1079) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table930
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table930) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table931
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table931) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table932
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table932) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table933
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table933) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table934
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table934) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table935
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table935) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table936
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table936) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1070
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,141 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1070) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table937
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table937) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1071
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1071) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table938
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table938) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table939
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table939) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table900
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table900) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table901
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table901) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table902
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table902) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table903
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table903) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table904
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table904) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table905
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table905) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table906
2023-07-12 15:00:15,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table906) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table907
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table907) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table908
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table908) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table909
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1867713792=2, srv902749276=4, srv905790209=5, srv1573710498=1, srv1055501012=0, srv662449441=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,147 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table909) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,152 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1285706714=0, srv2103349180=6, srv33329007=9, srv1860248511=3, srv2068163086=5, srv1819575597=2, srv494519928=12, srv681971187=14, srv1581280210=1, srv189391931=4, srv280868815=8, srv430754296=11, srv2140721720=7, srv369682506=10, srv557247076=13} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,162 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1701766444=2, srv504185839=5, srv57211875=6, srv622469371=7, srv781965911=9, srv462366799=4, srv694237822=8, srv1320038049=0, srv147671016=1, srv284286611=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,166 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1990273686=4, srv881746812=9, srv1852812307=3, srv1758512002=2, srv314734032=5, srv550255217=7, srv1614216268=1, srv1188078585=0, srv323250557=6, srv643841712=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,170 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,173 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,182 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,190 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,197 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,198 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1136005404=0, srv1240749178=1, srv936245396=9, srv441167873=7, srv384603598=6, srv358677011=5, srv1371652440=2, srv316788054=4, srv631412951=8, srv1436828122=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,206 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,207 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,217 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,218 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,219 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2036106037=6, srv1370616594=1, srv199749911=5, srv1362449921=0, srv1937769493=4, srv617614823=8, srv1558018770=3, srv253535712=7, srv1507758098=2, srv886422566=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,230 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,240 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,248 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,255 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2081292538=6, srv946258377=9, srv1962927224=5, srv763197594=7, srv1295567705=1, srv1625644430=4, srv1482738984=2, srv855547884=8, srv1601671191=3, srv1062968536=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,260 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1551031124=4, srv844610369=9, srv1822628329=5, srv625080169=7, srv1333867466=2, srv445488603=6, srv639758946=8, srv1184875424=1, srv1148846322=0, srv1543128949=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,268 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,272 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1598027449=1, srv2077345495=3, srv545202672=5, srv745216443=8, srv1230689885=0, srv593454638=7, srv551006525=6, srv423006672=4, srv1659639649=2, srv914564035=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,276 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1310460657=1, srv315345884=6, srv1397351906=2, srv927706690=9, srv578865521=7, srv680367066=8, srv1276946962=0, srv1813329497=5, srv1450656223=4, srv1447507115=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1208135836=1, srv1588733524=3, srv1881308216=6, srv1774116695=4, srv2113708050=7, srv1536081253=2, srv1847280922=5, srv3524196=8, srv460881089=9, srv1051967946=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,284 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,287 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,288 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,297 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,298 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,308 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,316 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,323 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,324 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,332 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,346 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,347 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv476183672=7, srv309339000=6, srv1747711159=3, srv859090160=9, srv1314281427=1, srv600266467=8, srv1854645967=4, srv1343489728=2, srv1933229535=5, srv120618067=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,350 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,356 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,365 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,366 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table141) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table142) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table143) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table144) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table145) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table146) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table147) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table148) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table149) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,384 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,385 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table150) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,393 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table151) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,402 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,403 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,404 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table140) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table152) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table153) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table154) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,415 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,416 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,424 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,429 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1790164429=2, srv2072253701=4, srv1411868089=1, srv636357567=6, srv786589734=9, srv648372146=7, srv1121891088=0, srv1807252362=3, srv745124084=8, srv2130329075=5} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,436 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,437 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv20685188=5, srv1985031178=4, srv43561604=6, srv1943035896=3, srv1862595251=2, srv975658256=7, srv1210938049=0, srv1811719489=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,444 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1891064718=5, srv1135640862=0, srv1407332695=1, srv841155404=7, srv426006930=6, srv155089417=3, srv1447427622=2, srv1661255674=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,448 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,453 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,457 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,470 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,471 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,475 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,493 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,497 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,500 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,501 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,502 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,503 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,504 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,505 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,506 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,507 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,508 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,509 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,510 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,511 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,512 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,513 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,514 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,515 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,516 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,517 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,518 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,519 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,520 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,521 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,522 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,523 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,524 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,525 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1123923064=0, srv340818080=5, srv1766963170=4, srv1627109739=3, srv1555547371=2, srv571584439=6, srv617766299=7, srv1285056576=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,526 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,527 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,529 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table120) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,530 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table121) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,531 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table122) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,532 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table123) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,533 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table124) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,534 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table125) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,535 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table126) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table127) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,536 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table128) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table129) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table90) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,537 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table91) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table92) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,538 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table93) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table94) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,539 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table95) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table96) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,540 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table97) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,541 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table98) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,542 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table99) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,543 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table110) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table111) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,544 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table112) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table113) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,545 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table114) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table115) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,546 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table116) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table117) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,547 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table118) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table119) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table80) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,548 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table81) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table82) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,549 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table83) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table84) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,550 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table85) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table86) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,551 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table87) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table88) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,552 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table89) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table79) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,553 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,554 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,555 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,556 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table70) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,557 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table71) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,558 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table72) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,559 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table73) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,560 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table74) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,561 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table75) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,562 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,563 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table76) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,564 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,565 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table77) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,566 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,567 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table78) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,568 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table68) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table130) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,569 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table69) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,570 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table131) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,571 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table132) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,572 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table133) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,573 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table134) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table135) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,574 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table136) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,575 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table137) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,576 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table138) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,577 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table139) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table60) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,578 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table61) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,579 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table62) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,580 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table63) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,581 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table64) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,582 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table65) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,583 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table66) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table67) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,584 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table57) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table58) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,585 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table59) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,586 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,587 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,588 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table56) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,589 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,590 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,591 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,592 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,593 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,594 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,595 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table100) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,596 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table101) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,597 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table102) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table103) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table104) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,598 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table105) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table106) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table107) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table108) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table109) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,604 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,605 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,606 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,607 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1825491120=2, srv880592473=7, srv235462618=4, srv835626494=6, srv1850807938=3, srv377815967=5, srv1214583978=0, srv124890807=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052651472=0, srv1153657876=1, srv186940772=3, srv70654470=4, srv1287417567=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,608 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052651472=0, srv1153657876=1, srv186940772=3, srv70654470=4, srv1287417567=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052651472=0, srv1153657876=1, srv186940772=3, srv70654470=4, srv1287417567=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,609 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052651472=0, srv1153657876=1, srv186940772=3, srv70654470=4, srv1287417567=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1052651472=0, srv1153657876=1, srv186940772=3, srv70654470=4, srv1287417567=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,610 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,637 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,640 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,641 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,642 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,643 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,644 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,645 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,646 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,647 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,649 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table13) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,650 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,650 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,651 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,652 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,653 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,654 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,655 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,656 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,657 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,658 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,659 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,662 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,663 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,664 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table14) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,665 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,665 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,666 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,667 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,668 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,669 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,670 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,671 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,672 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,673 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,674 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,675 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,676 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,677 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,678 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,679 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table15) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,680 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,680 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,681 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,682 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,683 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,684 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,686 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,687 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,688 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,689 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,690 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,691 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,692 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,693 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,694 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,695 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table16) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,696 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,697 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,698 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,699 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,701 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,702 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,703 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,704 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,705 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,706 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,707 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,708 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,709 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,710 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table17) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,711 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,712 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,714 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,715 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,716 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,717 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,718 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,719 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,720 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,721 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,722 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,723 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,724 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,725 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table18) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,726 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,726 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,727 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,728 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,729 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,730 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,731 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,732 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,733 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,734 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,735 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,736 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,737 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,738 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,739 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,740 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table19) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,741 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,742 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,743 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,744 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,745 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,746 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,747 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,748 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,749 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,750 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,751 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,752 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,753 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,754 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,755 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table50) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,756 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,757 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,758 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,759 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,760 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,761 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,762 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,763 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,764 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,765 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,766 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,767 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,768 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,769 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,770 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table51) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,771 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,772 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,773 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,774 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,775 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,776 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,777 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,778 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,779 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,780 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,781 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,782 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,783 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,784 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,785 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table52) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,786 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,787 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,788 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,789 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,790 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,791 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,792 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,793 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,794 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,795 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,796 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,797 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,798 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,799 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,800 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,801 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table53) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,802 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,803 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,804 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,805 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,806 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,807 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,808 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,809 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,810 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,811 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,812 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,813 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,814 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,815 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,816 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,817 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table10) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,818 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,818 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,819 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,820 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,821 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,822 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,823 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,824 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,825 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,826 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,827 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,828 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,831 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,832 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table54) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,833 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,833 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,834 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,835 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,836 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,837 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,838 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,839 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,840 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,841 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,842 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,843 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,844 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,845 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,846 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,847 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table11) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,848 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,848 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,849 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,850 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,851 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,852 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,853 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,854 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,855 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,856 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,857 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,858 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,859 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,860 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,861 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,862 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table55) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,863 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,864 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,865 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,866 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,867 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,868 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,869 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,870 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,871 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,872 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,873 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,874 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,875 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,876 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,877 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table12) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,878 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,879 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,880 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,881 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,882 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,883 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,884 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,885 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,886 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,887 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,888 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,889 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,890 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table46) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,893 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,894 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,895 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,896 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,897 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,898 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,899 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,900 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,901 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,902 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,903 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,904 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,905 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,906 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,907 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table47) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,908 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,909 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,910 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,911 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,912 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,913 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,914 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,915 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,917 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,918 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,919 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,920 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,921 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,922 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table48) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,923 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,924 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,925 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,926 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,927 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,928 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,929 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,930 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,931 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,933 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,934 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,935 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,936 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,937 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table49) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,938 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,939 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,940 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,941 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,942 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,943 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,944 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,945 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,946 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,947 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,948 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,949 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,950 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,951 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,952 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table40) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,953 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,955 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,956 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,957 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,958 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,959 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,960 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,961 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,962 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,963 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,964 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,965 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,966 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,967 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table41) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,968 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,969 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,970 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,971 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,972 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,973 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,974 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,975 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,976 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,977 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,978 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,979 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,980 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,981 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:15,982 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table42) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:15,983 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:15,984 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:15,985 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:15,986 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:15,987 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:15,988 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:15,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:15,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:15,991 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:15,992 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:15,993 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:15,994 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:15,995 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:15,996 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:15,997 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,004 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table43) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,006 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,007 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,008 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,009 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,010 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,011 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,012 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,013 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,014 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,015 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,016 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,017 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,018 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,019 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table44) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,020 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,021 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,022 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,023 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,024 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,025 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,026 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,027 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,028 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,029 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,030 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,031 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table45) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,035 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,049 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table35) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,050 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,051 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,052 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,053 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,054 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,055 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,056 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,057 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,058 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,059 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,060 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,061 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,062 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,063 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,064 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table36) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,065 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,066 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,067 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,069 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,070 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,071 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,072 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,073 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,074 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,075 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,076 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,077 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,078 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,079 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table37) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,080 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,081 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,082 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,083 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,084 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,085 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,086 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,087 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,088 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,089 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,090 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,091 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,092 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table38) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,096 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,097 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,098 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,099 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,100 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,101 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,102 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,103 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,104 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,105 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,106 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,107 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,108 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table39) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,109 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,110 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,111 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,112 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,113 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,114 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,115 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,116 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,117 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,118 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,119 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,120 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,121 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,122 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,123 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table5) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,124 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,125 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,127 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,128 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,129 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,130 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,131 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,132 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,133 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,134 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,135 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,136 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,137 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,138 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table4) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,139 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,140 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,142 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,143 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,144 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,145 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,146 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,147 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,149 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,150 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,151 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,152 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,153 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,154 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,155 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,156 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,157 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,158 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,159 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,160 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,161 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table3) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,163 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,164 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,165 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,166 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,167 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,168 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,169 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,171 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,173 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,174 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,175 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,176 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,177 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,178 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table2) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,181 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,194 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,195 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table1) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,196 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,197 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,198 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,199 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,200 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,201 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,202 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,203 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,204 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,205 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,206 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,207 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,208 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,209 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,210 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table0) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,211 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,211 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,212 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,213 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,214 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,215 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,216 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,217 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,218 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,219 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,220 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,221 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,222 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,223 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,224 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,225 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table30) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,226 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,227 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,228 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,229 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,230 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,231 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,232 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,233 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,234 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,235 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,236 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,237 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,238 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,239 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,240 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table9) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,241 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,241 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,242 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,243 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,244 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,245 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,246 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,247 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,248 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,249 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,250 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,251 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,252 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,253 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,254 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table31) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,260 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,261 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,262 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,263 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,264 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,265 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,266 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,267 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,268 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,269 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,270 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table8) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,271 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,272 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,273 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,274 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,275 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,276 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,277 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,278 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,279 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,280 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,281 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,282 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,283 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,284 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,285 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table32) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,286 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,287 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,288 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,289 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,290 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,291 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,292 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,293 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,294 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,295 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,296 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,297 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,298 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,299 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,300 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table7) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,301 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,302 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,303 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,304 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,305 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,306 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,307 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,308 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,309 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,310 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,311 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,312 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,313 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,314 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table33) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,315 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,316 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,317 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,318 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,319 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,320 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,321 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,322 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,323 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,324 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,325 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,326 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,327 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,328 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,329 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table6) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,330 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,331 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,332 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,333 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,334 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,335 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,336 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,337 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,338 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,339 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,340 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,341 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,342 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,343 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,344 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table34) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,345 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,346 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,347 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,348 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,349 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,350 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,351 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,352 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,353 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,354 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,355 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,356 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,357 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,358 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,359 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table24) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,360 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,361 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,362 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,363 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,364 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,365 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,366 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,367 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,368 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,369 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,370 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,371 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,372 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,373 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table25) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,376 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,377 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,378 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,379 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,380 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,381 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,382 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,383 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,384 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,385 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,386 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,387 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,388 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,389 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table26) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,390 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,391 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,392 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,393 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,394 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,395 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,396 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,397 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,398 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,399 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,400 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,401 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,402 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,403 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,404 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table27) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,405 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,406 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,407 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,408 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,409 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,410 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,411 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,412 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,413 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,414 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,415 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,416 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,417 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,418 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,419 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table28) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,420 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,421 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,422 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,423 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,424 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,425 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,426 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,427 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,428 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,429 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,430 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,431 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,432 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,433 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,434 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table29) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,435 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,436 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,437 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,438 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,439 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,440 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,441 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,442 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,443 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,444 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,445 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,446 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,447 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,448 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,449 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table20) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,450 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,451 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,452 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,453 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,454 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,455 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,456 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,457 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,458 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,459 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,460 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,461 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,462 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,463 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,464 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table21) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,465 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,466 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,467 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,468 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,469 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,470 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,471 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,472 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,473 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,474 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,475 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,476 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,477 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,478 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,479 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table22) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,480 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1710): Start Generate Balance plan for table: table23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv690972628=330, srv1098517576=23, srv1520607260=109, srv885429345=372, srv1366078059=70, srv517299481=293, srv1633889678=136, srv2143520465=246, srv1812975388=170, srv839358378=359, srv916692830=376, srv2130219296=243, srv386852470=274, srv851140099=363, srv1888097917=192, srv225302701=251, srv1188489495=38, srv1188146221=37, srv955543379=384, srv1452113455=87, srv1702083652=150, srv1834520485=177, srv552757230=299, srv1151176038=30, srv810665133=353, srv658077485=323, srv630490081=320, srv1311462335=54, srv408624422=279, srv1801371811=165, srv1844255454=181, srv285417266=260, srv1985001675=209, srv1471437860=93, srv1763193291=159, srv138650691=74, srv1209100964=43, srv35906541=269, srv239685721=255, srv7848264=343, srv101895802=1, srv537181772=296, srv1768184235=161, srv1847022906=184, srv1466819860=92, srv515667380=292, srv583317492=307, srv23387602=253, srv962256653=385, srv1499643825=99, srv1741076699=155, srv109721657=22, srv1070740821=14, srv159029290=124, srv2050194305=224, srv1827812299=176, srv1528237543=112, srv786356702=346, srv1674691871=143, srv1482907885=96, srv1355204268=68, srv1989766547=212, srv1440569927=82, srv1023105966=2, srv1530517709=113, srv1452297146=88, srv1508718142=105, srv1605330493=128, srv1714215247=153, srv1843644644=180, srv598492533=310, srv1450211777=85, srv393482476=276, srv1925406765=197, srv1635302378=137, srv2086030686=234, srv386661663=273, srv79843288=351, srv1328333632=58, srv1268294006=49, srv787407901=347, srv1605087069=127, srv851238648=364, srv1818523386=171, srv1112787171=24, srv1759083507=158, srv1877362195=189, srv224149763=250, srv786050595=345, srv1318843846=55, srv33428759=264, srv1863291136=187, srv401859721=278, srv1675957790=144, srv1947758428=202, srv989029704=391, srv214792816=247, srv2075817806=231, srv914408730=374, srv58001075=306, srv1074293606=16, srv839536093=360, srv840273426=361, srv460384210=285, srv514012235=290, srv723487813=338, srv1349841808=65, srv1571220771=120, srv1388979832=75, srv2126531230=241, srv1659569239=141, srv630028634=319, srv1810291180=169, srv614365366=315, srv1994026646=213, srv345517590=265, srv1902232984=195, srv2138372228=245, srv720179624=337, srv1349862979=66, srv874652982=369, srv2076290150=232, srv962551646=386, srv748472480=341, srv1326290361=57, srv1262722721=47, srv2057224939=228, srv1587199107=123, srv1053946395=12, srv201625289=215, srv1168779557=34, srv1843497159=178, srv1410454842=77, srv373649404=271, srv1071964570=15, srv558183064=301, srv1132435097=26, srv673847826=325, srv686899836=329, srv1540889401=114, srv938536053=380, srv2054175403=225, srv1801655914=166, srv1117896233=25, srv627238601=318, srv1955305960=205, srv83810901=357, srv818707648=354, srv1075384919=17, srv693611921=331, srv1452712425=89, srv1171083741=35, srv1643602224=138, srv828626950=356, srv1512347486=107, srv2118483211=240, srv399590069=277, srv1502538421=101, srv387926461=275, srv2041184394=221, srv1608970624=129, srv67884580=327, srv1378899512=71, srv1276582255=51, srv1826005859=173, srv299222571=261, srv633441167=321, srv792620220=349, srv114275605=28, srv899700370=373, srv1026766547=3, srv1336209148=59, srv180620363=168, srv619581150=317, srv193591590=200, srv1985310983=210, srv1166909384=33, srv165496844=139, srv978822384=389, srv1150251214=29, srv1775982934=163, srv1525751032=111, srv2021319031=220, srv2096323084=236, srv1094833564=21, srv1266818266=48, srv925044414=378, srv1803472349=167, srv1475280872=94, srv2064971401=230, srv2112210310=237, srv864253229=367, srv1160788706=31, srv15927329=125, srv87622968=371, srv1309733066=53, srv151755103=108, srv602116571=312, srv142844432=79, srv709988369=333, srv1341700750=60, srv1932431537=199, srv1286182765=52, srv797990443=350, srv1447398123=83, srv1262375766=46, srv170839973=151, srv2114367018=238, srv1503788804=102, srv962593663=387, srv450107128=284, srv590059802=308, srv1460125=90, srv601224006=311, srv1748396940=156, srv603300189=313, srv1269088526=50, srv1772099092=162, srv239368437=254, srv967455653=388, srv1205890809=42, srv262803191=259, srv38408236=272, srv166345950=142, srv1431045814=81, srv2064351304=229, srv704726986=332, srv1911438058=196, srv1972933378=208, srv1037866152=7, srv663765086=324, srv419473447=280, srv1380295203=72, srv782998079=342, srv1878479215=190, srv150785797=104, srv1594435825=126, srv1226633654=44, srv134901125=64, srv2081470602=233, srv257589031=258, srv86444444=368, srv1520687779=110, srv1561671964=116, srv554956006=300, srv1658500582=140, srv244530191=256, srv1141400195=27, srv1989012558=211, srv105500327=13, srv1202148585=40, srv1925907670=198, srv321362897=263, srv355908560=268, srv514962092=291, srv858711002=366, srv351430016=267, srv505322346=288, srv1880379781=191, srv639186565=322, srv743437868=340, srv520747029=294, srv1962321792=206, srv1352938012=67, srv2087042851=235, srv1076943241=18, srv435320418=281, srv219459179=248, srv104514077=9, srv741552563=339, srv842378410=362, srv1566853540=118, srv2048706485=223, srv1038547287=8, srv1713563807=152, srv1965345711=207, srv534114643=295, srv1736696811=154, srv1032015025=5, srv1228608003=45, srv1633151694=135, srv189431618=194, srv1845507708=182, srv101645938=0, srv2017919797=217, srv1935961534=201, srv717227279=335, srv1451928267=86, srv247460706=257, srv233209147=252, srv1082955559=19, srv2056725083=227, srv810038081=352, srv1764685203=160, srv1699524448=149, srv1821708437=172, srv71348947=334, srv1162033140=32, srv1481116307=95, srv1843514038=179, srv68587679=328, srv940272097=381, srv1827333049=175, srv838251661=358, srv853012805=365, srv916431388=375, srv1382085170=73, srv2117274725=239, srv351067573=266, srv1418963491=78, srv2042263461=222, srv1321877842=56, srv104762922=11, srv1681274987=145, srv440467855=282, srv1181529433=36, srv942544070=382, srv979968236=390, srv1857277074=185, srv1347827907=61, srv1548689398=115, srv370178754=270, srv675087896=326, srv949606515=383, srv874893395=370, srv1575873353=122, srv1827110136=174, srv1046772913=10, srv168644955=147, srv1462282893=91, srv1031340543=4, srv2017255667=216, srv785745400=344, srv1565124823=117, srv573958381=304, srv1627039997=133, srv2009726637=214, srv1891148853=193, srv223409788=249, srv1496890256=98, srv1036117555=6, srv1203132515=41, srv301846119=262, srv1681973704=146, srv997662745=392, srv1845564523=183, srv824988221=355, srv2020547576=219, srv1862709092=186, srv2055725110=226, srv1188877648=39, srv1348167551=62, srv1625691783=132, srv1755060748=157, srv787507134=348, srv1362949839=69, srv143101870=80, srv1448526190=84, srv1501012941=100, srv2127954212=242, srv1570191789=119, srv19528598=203, srv482913543=286, srv1616689384=130, srv1092630221=20, srv213030814=244, srv1694631424=148, srv1348971515=63, srv579269278=305, srv930202796=379, srv603790246=314, srv1619217617=131, srv2019426088=218, srv570950271=303, srv508003916=289, srv446917147=283, srv1503985315=103, srv1631271448=134, srv1403490033=76, srv539214503=297, srv596131645=309, srv562372974=302, srv1575569295=121, srv488255367=287, srv1953177225=204, srv1876921736=188, srv619191000=316, srv549484164=298, srv917145633=377, srv717234523=336, srv1511874090=106, srv149118243=97, srv1776159508=164} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:00:16,481 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:00:16,482 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:00:16,483 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:00:16,484 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:00:16,485 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:00:16,486 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:00:16,487 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:00:16,488 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:00:16,489 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:00:16,490 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:00:16,491 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:00:16,492 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:00:16,493 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:00:16,494 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,495 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Table specific (table23) - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 15:00:16,496 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,496 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv747328394=1, srv10697167=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,498 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,499 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=3200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,527 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 28 ms to try 3200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1054055573=0, srv1770510717=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,599 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv548586892=1, srv506817334=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,600 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2078354286=1, srv1350525597=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv555659954=1, srv1430927252=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,601 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1715642516=0, srv2008243081=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,602 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1294760739=0, srv584264580=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1507622262=1, srv1403153688=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,603 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,604 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.6932409012131716 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.8); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,620 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,622 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1405863523=0, srv607746963=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,631 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1432, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,634 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.40878413881917497 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4717368961973279); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv822760585=1, srv1982893014=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,635 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=53, number of hosts=2, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.034662045060658585 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.04000000000000001); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv921908901=2, srv438656871=1, srv1546142520=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,636 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,637 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608543, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896258); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,659 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 23 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608543 to a new imbalance of 0.004043905257076833. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.3333333333333333); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1423217522=1, srv2003962372=2, srv1111374462=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,660 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.25015176308042714 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.2886751345948129); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1602558660=2, srv1006206633=0, srv1028835991=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=2, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,661 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2888503755054882, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.33333333333333337); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-12 15:00:16,684 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 23 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2888503755054882 to a new imbalance of 0.0030329289428076256. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.25); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv841092577=2, srv241591679=1, srv1490023877=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,685 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=7200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 15 ms to try 7200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1146466398=0, srv683360870=2, srv1980542936=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,700 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=9600
2023-07-12 15:00:16,712 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 12 ms to try 9600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 2 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1963796493=1, srv1794502870=0, srv81301454=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=20, number of hosts=3, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,713 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.42216593343109815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4871794871794873); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=96000
2023-07-12 15:00:16,891 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 178 ms to try 96000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 13 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.42216593343109815 to a new imbalance of 0.003942807625649913. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.325); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv446001543=3, srv1965890414=0, srv26760383=1, srv371993863=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,891 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,892 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=3, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,892 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.25526148491585815, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.29457175359290033); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-12 15:00:16,915 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 23 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.25526148491585815 to a new imbalance of 0.0020219526285384167. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.16666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1774651308=1, srv496737779=3, srv1970564729=2, srv1700808462=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,916 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=12800
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 16 ms to try 12800 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.009098786828422877. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.75); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1073595687=0, srv142146981=2, srv1448463504=3, srv1230705790=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,932 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=16000
2023-07-12 15:00:16,952 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20 ms to try 16000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 3 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.007279029462738302. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv388119920=3, srv1191895346=2, srv1144157234=1, srv1002500559=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:16,953 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:16,954 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:16,954 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.5003035261608542, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.5773502691896257); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=38400
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 50 ms to try 38400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 6 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.5003035261608542 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv81547152=3, srv2064607925=2, srv1819291839=1, srv1263340237=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,005 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,006 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6127441778046339, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7071067811865475); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=25600
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 33 ms to try 25600 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6127441778046339 to a new imbalance of 0.006065857885615251. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv237639748=1, srv280545345=2, srv2048918863=0, srv793496667=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,038 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.6852343510309111, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.7907604410896715); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-12 15:00:17,067 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 29 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.6852343510309111 to a new imbalance of 0.006932409012131715. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.5714285714285714); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1346391981=1, srv563613099=3, srv1264836202=0, srv1539391912=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,068 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=19200
2023-07-12 15:00:17,093 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 25 ms to try 19200 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008087810514153667. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.6666666666666666); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,093 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1284762428=1, srv1072390719=0, srv1729005113=2, srv1852160964=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.0962834585018294 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.11111111111111113); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv189955236=1, srv47269612=3, srv1699083400=0, srv205439037=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.17331022530329285 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.19999999999999996); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv756607728=3, srv1941559376=0, srv556477519=1, srv613253532=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,094 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,095 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=7, number of hosts=4, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,095 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=22400
2023-07-12 15:00:17,125 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 30 ms to try 22400 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 5 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.008665511265164644. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.7142857142857143); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv432583335=4, srv1867721085=2, srv1108628345=1, srv1042758812=0, srv2135324024=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=4, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,126 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.22705408170595567 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.26202041028867284); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,139 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:17,141 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1298399619=1, srv1043024336=0, srv1574993100=3, srv1335935426=2, srv659234115=5, srv2108696902=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:17,148 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:17,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:17,151 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:14448000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 15:00:17,151 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.38476461962415054, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.4440183710462697); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 15:00:37,620 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 20470 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 1019 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.38476461962415054 to a new imbalance of 0.004107049292652452. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.33853820598006645); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:37,638 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:00:37,639 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1460304425=1, srv331572841=4, srv1439946440=0, srv300273244=3, srv586980482=5, srv2083499469=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:00:37,648 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=1500, number of hosts=6, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:00:37,651 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:00:37,652 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:16800000 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 15:00:37,652 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.2979275647131677, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3438084096789955); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 15:01:00,254 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 22606 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 920 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.2979275647131677 to a new imbalance of 0.003188908145580589. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.26285714285714284); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:00,255 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv117341672=1, srv491859520=10, srv644063822=11, srv827283255=12, srv959550642=13, srv1616958153=5, srv2119911698=7, srv1029207622=0, srv1547975222=3, srv1932598414=6, srv1588471835=4, srv379465507=9, srv998496102=14, srv1287654462=2, srv249076170=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:00,256 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=15, number of hosts=15, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,257 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.12507588154021357 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.14433756729740646); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1109072327=2, srv291925005=8, srv1634078485=5, srv1246023917=3, srv1035881724=0, srv1486796126=4, srv1957040241=6, srv2126010253=7, srv523243752=9, srv1075001403=1} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:00,258 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:00,259 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,259 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-12 15:01:00,373 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 114 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 9 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010918544194107453. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1329611965=3, srv222222672=9, srv1072343472=0, srv1792454248=7, srv1078744912=1, srv1578786641=4, srv1684775027=6, srv124306492=2, srv1608362980=5, srv2097624618=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=6, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,374 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.055531997651093117 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.06408392528936147); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1379232114=0, srv1732482214=3, srv765864054=8, srv817646854=9, srv194695422=5, srv1926601159=4, srv439006763=7, srv1968670241=6, srv1568595705=1, srv1692942066=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=54, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:00,375 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=432000
2023-07-12 15:01:01,169 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 794 ms to try 432000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 48 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01078374735220489. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8888888888888888); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1847443807=1, srv722137561=8, srv389874153=4, srv631763218=6, srv1977587898=2, srv910015027=9, srv1089850492=0, srv26321231=3, srv452136358=5, srv636261073=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:01,170 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=55, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:01,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:01,171 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=440000
2023-07-12 15:01:01,989 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 819 ms to try 440000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 49 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010808255868914448. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8909090909090909); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:01,989 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1775485680=1, srv738561415=8, srv198761280=3, srv660684954=6, srv881337614=9, srv662924588=7, srv1977703172=2, srv38114922=4, srv512006850=5, srv1248727872=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:01,990 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:01,991 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=448000
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 838 ms to try 448000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 50 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.010831889081455806. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.8928571428571429); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv800921814=9, srv702361786=8, srv129761434=1, srv2058963306=5, srv1622493707=2, srv1751776511=3, srv511593859=6, srv1231260743=0, srv2048134848=4, srv608735272=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:02,829 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:02,830 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=16, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:02,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:02,830 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164645, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=1.0, need balance); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=128000
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 202 ms to try 128000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 14 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164645 to a new imbalance of 0.01061525129982669. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.875); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv68058142=9, srv548155346=6, srv565887990=7, srv1070223175=0, srv283536807=5, srv1212613478=1, srv1697003660=3, srv148347585=2, srv1921490693=4, srv622225678=8} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,032 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=8, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3064913174100616 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.3536909802912111); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2028431285=7, srv1287192185=0, srv1358145308=1, srv175679031=4, srv145549573=2, srv1633143636=3, srv1969450950=6, srv186916106=5, srv236004526=8, srv484431738=9} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=9, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.34662045060658575 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.39999999999999997); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,033 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1710443660=6, srv531689513=9, srv1971752597=8, srv1576498062=4, srv1135248460=0, srv1492631798=2, srv136300795=1, srv1669350731=5, srv1847982775=7, srv1559251409=3} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=10, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.3851338340073176 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.44444444444444453); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,034 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1642964753=4, srv1161087372=0, srv345000825=7, srv875749240=9, srv1453890254=3, srv1314706396=1, srv53067440=8, srv1359497426=2, srv2049938117=5, srv2078867983=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,035 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,036 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=123, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,036 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8002334382626535 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.923469387755102); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,037 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1668203552=2, srv229805541=4, srv1302567013=1, srv2075819246=3, srv236622905=5, srv832711510=9, srv61309683=7, srv1247036882=0, srv664667978=8, srv473104274=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,038 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=155, number of hosts=10, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.8131812243798632 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9384111329343621); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv2015156915=5, srv1740892096=2, srv1184242372=0, srv1279610772=1, srv1939690407=4, srv188899270=3, srv515512976=7, srv260633184=6} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,039 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.05755254949858986 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0664156421213727); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv592632839=6, srv205618462=2, srv549180502=5, srv754595821=7, srv1199105200=1, srv1098207751=0, srv2092341562=3, srv298711836=4} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,040 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=14, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,041 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.06673965003400768 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.07701755613924488); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,041 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv1478444085=2, srv208965929=5, srv523641349=7, srv1794280972=3, srv503303015=6, srv1855888458=4, srv1384408752=1, srv1351077142=0} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,042 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,043 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=130, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,043 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.28093705674099306 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.32420136347910594); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,044 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,045 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv247340061=5, srv1988474047=3, srv1993632928=4, srv1423605965=0, srv1805948776=1, srv830309958=6, srv1893973154=2, srv954657130=7} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,046 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=140, number of hosts=8, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,047 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(381): Cluster wide - skipping load balancing because weighted average imbalance=0.07533492111851356 <= threshold(1.0). If you want more aggressive balancing, either lower hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.minCostNeedBalance from 1.0 or increase the relative multiplier(s) of the specific cost function(s). functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.08693649897076465); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,047 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv808158424=4, srv1832188378=0, srv576081211=1, srv696646929=3, srv658882560=2} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=5, number of hosts=5, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,048 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.21663778162911612, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.25); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=80000
2023-07-12 15:01:03,157 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 109 ms to try 80000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 4 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.21663778162911612 to a new imbalance of 0.0024263431542461008. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.2); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,172 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1718): Start Generate Balance plan for cluster.
2023-07-12 15:01:03,179 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(334): Hosts are {srv403406791=278, srv2049444649=198, srv901668532=358, srv968251832=381, srv1098674095=17, srv1591507908=114, srv236449237=236, srv1503159225=93, srv1012253922=2, srv1191430236=34, srv1497588725=90, srv1667048396=126, srv1217552167=45, srv1515247791=94, srv320682776=255, srv33586342=257, srv1977300426=186, srv824502844=343, srv1737834800=138, srv1418829202=74, srv1936203779=169, srv1517028752=96, srv195920750=175, srv1975598240=184, srv98253815=385, srv1281187883=55, srv242285916=238, srv1246597393=50, srv590290241=305, srv1487165794=87, srv1210637433=41, srv1910455468=168, srv1971956498=181, srv2052615631=200, srv401318655=277, srv1632858498=119, srv941976680=373, srv55341846=295, srv1615560213=117, srv1135572675=23, srv30401856=252, srv341998259=259, srv1303040300=59, srv1279021656=54, srv459166115=285, srv2100143842=215, srv224009882=231, srv374217725=269, srv1902697121=166, srv1192039836=35, srv2109803944=219, srv975587335=383, srv1379653780=70, srv1906998045=167, srv1998023644=191, srv2036032958=196, srv1250522872=51, srv400736634=276, srv250032939=241, srv2144122247=227, srv1222783944=48, srv1597104480=116, srv255060188=242, srv93284204=369, srv168215025=129, srv565383646=298, srv630228177=315, srv1435931801=79, srv1752914579=143, srv356575992=264, srv1013528415=3, srv1560974238=104, srv987175928=389, srv1972126239=182, srv1576551389=111, srv499984210=288, srv339540701=258, srv1147853438=28, srv1300771896=58, srv1937256984=170, srv76425035=331, srv100198624=0, srv1342779727=64, srv954417952=378, srv1567989327=108, srv1638718707=122, srv262319021=245, srv1736700238=137, srv135189523=66, srv986739638=388, srv1252052423=52, srv948713638=374, srv1132744606=22, srv78377002=335, srv2091004846=210, srv630147042=314, srv1685763178=131, srv734191952=327, srv915690949=362, srv1529079615=97, srv564393029=297, srv213533614=225, srv973726805=382, srv1791714531=147, srv1334987488=62, srv829270669=344, srv1136239566=25, srv1498784992=91, srv387341079=272, srv2093747303=213, srv35576207=263, srv177401243=145, srv635561662=318, srv1800264516=150, srv806089791=337, srv1550253950=100, srv205477872=201, srv140108438=73, srv1041261684=5, srv621901177=311, srv732628155=326, srv991616641=390, srv113588972=24, srv1964648401=178, srv533118764=292, srv926566471=365, srv1868842389=160, srv579775356=303, srv850595461=348, srv188787128=164, srv1014643826=4, srv400168959=275, srv403777183=279, srv1449290330=81, srv1763647428=144, srv2093161026=212, srv1976054633=185, srv524323152=290, srv1084636672=13, srv443122303=280, srv928800666=368, srv975754307=384, srv1960774196=177, srv1345510280=65, srv1469615607=86, srv216117940=228, srv566143653=299, srv927681499=366, srv1836358055=152, srv710174927=324, srv628184326=313, srv918734528=363, srv1193975311=36, srv1208589904=39, srv874406625=354, srv851024127=349, srv1795089624=149, srv1813762348=151, srv239910573=237, srv746664732=329, srv255564060=243, srv1999725625=192, srv230631085=234, srv227065800=232, srv1843732229=154, srv211930333=220, srv299014520=249, srv207472005=208, srv231228888=235, srv1466079613=85, srv984930882=387, srv1623043026=118, srv1746649751=140, srv82020181=341, srv893423440=357, srv1199586682=38, srv1488596660=88, srv1561036688=105, srv1900547326=165, srv668457437=321, srv155894604=102, srv1653551218=124, srv1063293733=10, srv808511686=338, srv750463373=330, srv1501027654=92, srv1429377639=75, srv1390749752=72, srv1741510011=139, srv657511968=320, srv632885438=316, srv296120871=248, srv618423797=310, srv1707658059=133, srv1879471586=162, srv776254166=334, srv2033173637=195, srv1430796953=76, srv893150776=356, srv851245850=350, srv1559315497=103, srv2058475348=203, srv1452168618=83, srv1431973941=78, srv576162702=300, srv1297467248=57, srv198709638=188, srv2130786091=222, srv2093793285=214, srv954314285=377, srv1287874405=56, srv1144431436=27, srv1385466457=71, srv1943391708=171, srv371245925=267, srv197522736=183, srv400168444=274, srv364556550=266, srv1552045537=101, srv2001012873=193, srv360239114=265, srv902758411=359, srv8894111=355, srv1100148477=18, srv1566059244=107, srv1870544899=161, srv459620214=286, srv1730438623=136, srv769618857=332, srv37152547=268, srv1328544883=61, srv1515254767=95, srv579314929=301, srv2130573540=221, srv935808123=371, srv1004003897=1, srv2032782032=194, srv1664832546=125, srv383955140=271, srv1788154631=146, srv1197342883=37, srv809275871=339, srv449044953=281, srv1155528845=30, srv154405657=99, srv166986630=127, srv1967686888=179, srv1535983805=98, srv2057630557=202, srv2132102454=223, srv775767261=333, srv1148255758=29, srv2063085300=206, srv536206762=293, srv1751168046=142, srv1959918917=176, srv2051762270=199, srv304261094=253, srv614860867=309, srv2092835153=211, srv1635661474=120, srv920411204=364, srv1370388774=68, srv556607108=296, srv66904071=322, srv905040676=361, srv1366403046=67, srv21096504=218, srv1593139016=115, srv993853215=391, srv2101409056=216, srv537395623=294, srv966908527=380, srv1431589573=77, srv1689340955=132, srv933967183=370, srv655611785=319, srv218610584=229, srv249157015=240, srv1587781341=113, srv84191214=346, srv34491032=261, srv1946465389=173, srv903945039=360, srv1638191174=121, srv1452866637=84, srv2070476553=207, srv262700244=246, srv378973015=270, srv2103973493=217, srv1181209631=32, srv222358689=230, srv227417405=233, srv1570144861=109, srv1751010000=141, srv30335780=250, srv450382304=282, srv1672321990=128, srv32738458=256, srv1990165916=189, srv1097519379=16, srv1451438345=82, srv927839142=367, srv353361938=262, srv2076175800=209, srv94081053=372, srv996700703=392, srv1085968326=15, srv1123427354=21, srv1576693835=112, srv1120786355=20, srv1372908102=69, srv2062313828=205, srv1214525456=43, srv452848220=283, srv614249054=308, srv950482291=375, srv517001745=289, srv579622686=302, srv1792927960=148, srv257469113=244, srv611457526=306, srv622491933=312, srv964160515=379, srv1862478234=157, srv1720891674=134, srv1080100716=12, srv303533661=251, srv121362539=42, srv309490156=254, srv1340947276=63, srv1642002663=123, srv738405319=328, srv156280874=106, srv611597811=307, srv1844363327=155, srv864186055=351, srv1838153474=153, srv1070041127=11, srv87237449=353, srv1222306949=47, srv1046306832=6, srv1107482025=19, srv634802995=317, srv14891314=89, srv244451851=239, srv1983596920=187, srv528003255=291, srv588548002=304, srv1225217313=49, srv1219172526=46, srv836987793=345, srv282787124=247, srv342197825=260, srv1136284973=26, srv459010891=284, srv1056079509=9, srv1085926845=14, srv1574791061=110, srv870792595=352, srv396570614=273, srv1186122302=33, srv950579304=376, srv1261453467=53, srv2044207862=197, srv1321847014=60, srv1957223281=174, srv689233071=323, srv105336072=7, srv1884273255=163, srv2138010594=226, srv483490232=287, srv1946188122=172, srv1866478841=158, srv984655515=386, srv120923966=40, srv786150853=336, srv823454332=342, srv1994576230=190, srv1860261957=156, srv1216089778=44, srv21346981=224, srv1683481544=130, srv1969071994=180, srv1055939241=8, srv844273129=347, srv1443518175=80, srv1866999569=159, srv1155568452=31, srv1727301606=135, srv815339590=340, srv730582960=325, srv2059385685=204} racks are {rack=0}
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 0 is on host 0
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 1 is on host 1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 2 is on host 2
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 3 is on host 3
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 4 is on host 4
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 5 is on host 5
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 6 is on host 6
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 7 is on host 7
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 8 is on host 8
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 9 is on host 9
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 10 is on host 10
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 11 is on host 11
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 12 is on host 12
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 13 is on host 13
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 14 is on host 14
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 15 is on host 15
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 16 is on host 16
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 17 is on host 17
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 18 is on host 18
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 19 is on host 19
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 20 is on host 20
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 21 is on host 21
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 22 is on host 22
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 23 is on host 23
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 24 is on host 24
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 25 is on host 25
2023-07-12 15:01:03,180 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 26 is on host 26
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 27 is on host 27
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 28 is on host 28
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 29 is on host 29
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 30 is on host 30
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 31 is on host 31
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 32 is on host 32
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 33 is on host 33
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 34 is on host 34
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 35 is on host 35
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 36 is on host 36
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 37 is on host 37
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 38 is on host 38
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 39 is on host 39
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 40 is on host 40
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 41 is on host 41
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 42 is on host 42
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 43 is on host 43
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 44 is on host 44
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 45 is on host 45
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 46 is on host 46
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 47 is on host 47
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 48 is on host 48
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 49 is on host 49
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 50 is on host 50
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 51 is on host 51
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 52 is on host 52
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 53 is on host 53
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 54 is on host 54
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 55 is on host 55
2023-07-12 15:01:03,181 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 56 is on host 56
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 57 is on host 57
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 58 is on host 58
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 59 is on host 59
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 60 is on host 60
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 61 is on host 61
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 62 is on host 62
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 63 is on host 63
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 64 is on host 64
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 65 is on host 65
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 66 is on host 66
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 67 is on host 67
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 68 is on host 68
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 69 is on host 69
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 70 is on host 70
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 71 is on host 71
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 72 is on host 72
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 73 is on host 73
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 74 is on host 74
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 75 is on host 75
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 76 is on host 76
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 77 is on host 77
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 78 is on host 78
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 79 is on host 79
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 80 is on host 80
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 81 is on host 81
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 82 is on host 82
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 83 is on host 83
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 84 is on host 84
2023-07-12 15:01:03,182 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 85 is on host 85
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 86 is on host 86
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 87 is on host 87
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 88 is on host 88
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 89 is on host 89
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 90 is on host 90
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 91 is on host 91
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 92 is on host 92
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 93 is on host 93
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 94 is on host 94
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 95 is on host 95
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 96 is on host 96
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 97 is on host 97
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 98 is on host 98
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 99 is on host 99
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 100 is on host 100
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 101 is on host 101
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 102 is on host 102
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 103 is on host 103
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 104 is on host 104
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 105 is on host 105
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 106 is on host 106
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 107 is on host 107
2023-07-12 15:01:03,183 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 108 is on host 108
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 109 is on host 109
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 110 is on host 110
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 111 is on host 111
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 112 is on host 112
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 113 is on host 113
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 114 is on host 114
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 115 is on host 115
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 116 is on host 116
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 117 is on host 117
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 118 is on host 118
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 119 is on host 119
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 120 is on host 120
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 121 is on host 121
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 122 is on host 122
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 123 is on host 123
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 124 is on host 124
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 125 is on host 125
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 126 is on host 126
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 127 is on host 127
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 128 is on host 128
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 129 is on host 129
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 130 is on host 130
2023-07-12 15:01:03,184 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 131 is on host 131
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 132 is on host 132
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 133 is on host 133
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 134 is on host 134
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 135 is on host 135
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 136 is on host 136
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 137 is on host 137
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 138 is on host 138
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 139 is on host 139
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 140 is on host 140
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 141 is on host 141
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 142 is on host 142
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 143 is on host 143
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 144 is on host 144
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 145 is on host 145
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 146 is on host 146
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 147 is on host 147
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 148 is on host 148
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 149 is on host 149
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 150 is on host 150
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 151 is on host 151
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 152 is on host 152
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 153 is on host 153
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 154 is on host 154
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 155 is on host 155
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 156 is on host 156
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 157 is on host 157
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 158 is on host 158
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 159 is on host 159
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 160 is on host 160
2023-07-12 15:01:03,185 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 161 is on host 161
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 162 is on host 162
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 163 is on host 163
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 164 is on host 164
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 165 is on host 165
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 166 is on host 166
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 167 is on host 167
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 168 is on host 168
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 169 is on host 169
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 170 is on host 170
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 171 is on host 171
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 172 is on host 172
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 173 is on host 173
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 174 is on host 174
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 175 is on host 175
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 176 is on host 176
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 177 is on host 177
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 178 is on host 178
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 179 is on host 179
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 180 is on host 180
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 181 is on host 181
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 182 is on host 182
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 183 is on host 183
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 184 is on host 184
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 185 is on host 185
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 186 is on host 186
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 187 is on host 187
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 188 is on host 188
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 189 is on host 189
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 190 is on host 190
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 191 is on host 191
2023-07-12 15:01:03,186 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 192 is on host 192
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 193 is on host 193
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 194 is on host 194
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 195 is on host 195
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 196 is on host 196
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 197 is on host 197
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 198 is on host 198
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 199 is on host 199
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 200 is on host 200
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 201 is on host 201
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 202 is on host 202
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 203 is on host 203
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 204 is on host 204
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 205 is on host 205
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 206 is on host 206
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 207 is on host 207
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 208 is on host 208
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 209 is on host 209
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 210 is on host 210
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 211 is on host 211
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 212 is on host 212
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 213 is on host 213
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 214 is on host 214
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 215 is on host 215
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 216 is on host 216
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 217 is on host 217
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 218 is on host 218
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 219 is on host 219
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 220 is on host 220
2023-07-12 15:01:03,187 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 221 is on host 221
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 222 is on host 222
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 223 is on host 223
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 224 is on host 224
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 225 is on host 225
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 226 is on host 226
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 227 is on host 227
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 228 is on host 228
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 229 is on host 229
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 230 is on host 230
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 231 is on host 231
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 232 is on host 232
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 233 is on host 233
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 234 is on host 234
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 235 is on host 235
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 236 is on host 236
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 237 is on host 237
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 238 is on host 238
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 239 is on host 239
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 240 is on host 240
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 241 is on host 241
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 242 is on host 242
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 243 is on host 243
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 244 is on host 244
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 245 is on host 245
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 246 is on host 246
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 247 is on host 247
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 248 is on host 248
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 249 is on host 249
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 250 is on host 250
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 251 is on host 251
2023-07-12 15:01:03,188 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 252 is on host 252
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 253 is on host 253
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 254 is on host 254
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 255 is on host 255
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 256 is on host 256
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 257 is on host 257
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 258 is on host 258
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 259 is on host 259
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 260 is on host 260
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 261 is on host 261
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 262 is on host 262
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 263 is on host 263
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 264 is on host 264
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 265 is on host 265
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 266 is on host 266
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 267 is on host 267
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 268 is on host 268
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 269 is on host 269
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 270 is on host 270
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 271 is on host 271
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 272 is on host 272
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 273 is on host 273
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 274 is on host 274
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 275 is on host 275
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 276 is on host 276
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 277 is on host 277
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 278 is on host 278
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 279 is on host 279
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 280 is on host 280
2023-07-12 15:01:03,189 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 281 is on host 281
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 282 is on host 282
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 283 is on host 283
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 284 is on host 284
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 285 is on host 285
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 286 is on host 286
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 287 is on host 287
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 288 is on host 288
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 289 is on host 289
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 290 is on host 290
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 291 is on host 291
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 292 is on host 292
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 293 is on host 293
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 294 is on host 294
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 295 is on host 295
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 296 is on host 296
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 297 is on host 297
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 298 is on host 298
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 299 is on host 299
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 300 is on host 300
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 301 is on host 301
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 302 is on host 302
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 303 is on host 303
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 304 is on host 304
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 305 is on host 305
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 306 is on host 306
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 307 is on host 307
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 308 is on host 308
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 309 is on host 309
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 310 is on host 310
2023-07-12 15:01:03,190 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 311 is on host 311
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 312 is on host 312
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 313 is on host 313
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 314 is on host 314
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 315 is on host 315
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 316 is on host 316
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 317 is on host 317
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 318 is on host 318
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 319 is on host 319
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 320 is on host 320
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 321 is on host 321
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 322 is on host 322
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 323 is on host 323
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 324 is on host 324
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 325 is on host 325
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 326 is on host 326
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 327 is on host 327
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 328 is on host 328
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 329 is on host 329
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 330 is on host 330
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 331 is on host 331
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 332 is on host 332
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 333 is on host 333
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 334 is on host 334
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 335 is on host 335
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 336 is on host 336
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 337 is on host 337
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 338 is on host 338
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 339 is on host 339
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 340 is on host 340
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 341 is on host 341
2023-07-12 15:01:03,191 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 342 is on host 342
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 343 is on host 343
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 344 is on host 344
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 345 is on host 345
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 346 is on host 346
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 347 is on host 347
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 348 is on host 348
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 349 is on host 349
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 350 is on host 350
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 351 is on host 351
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 352 is on host 352
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 353 is on host 353
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 354 is on host 354
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 355 is on host 355
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 356 is on host 356
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 357 is on host 357
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 358 is on host 358
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 359 is on host 359
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 360 is on host 360
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 361 is on host 361
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 362 is on host 362
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 363 is on host 363
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 364 is on host 364
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 365 is on host 365
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 366 is on host 366
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 367 is on host 367
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 368 is on host 368
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 369 is on host 369
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 370 is on host 370
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 371 is on host 371
2023-07-12 15:01:03,192 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 372 is on host 372
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 373 is on host 373
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 374 is on host 374
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 375 is on host 375
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 376 is on host 376
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 377 is on host 377
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 378 is on host 378
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 379 is on host 379
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 380 is on host 380
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 381 is on host 381
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 382 is on host 382
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 383 is on host 383
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 384 is on host 384
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 385 is on host 385
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 386 is on host 386
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 387 is on host 387
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 388 is on host 388
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 389 is on host 389
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 390 is on host 390
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 391 is on host 391
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(362): server 392 is on host 392
2023-07-12 15:01:03,193 DEBUG [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer$Cluster(378): Number of tables=56, number of hosts=393, number of racks=1
2023-07-12 15:01:03,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(351): Running balancer because cluster has idle server(s). function cost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999987); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:03,196 WARN  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(497): calculatedMaxSteps:17606400 for loadbalancer's stochastic walk is larger than maxSteps:1000000. Hence load balancing may not work well. Setting parameter "hbase.master.balancer.stochastic.runMaxSteps" to true can overcome this issue.(This config change does not require service restart)
2023-07-12 15:01:03,196 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(505): Start StochasticLoadBalancer.balancer, initial weighted average imbalance=0.8665511265164633, functionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.9999999999999987); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.0); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0);  computedMaxSteps=1000000
2023-07-12 15:01:10,162 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(553): Finished computing new moving plan. Computation took 6968 ms to try 1000000 different iterations.  Found a solution that moves 55 regions; Going from a computed imbalance of 0.8665511265164633 to a new imbalance of 0.011915077989601387. funtionCost=RegionCountSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=500.0, imbalance=0.0); PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction : (not needed); MoveCostFunction : (multiplier=7.0, imbalance=0.9821428571428571); RackLocalityCostFunction : (multiplier=15.0, imbalance=0.0); TableSkewCostFunction : (multiplier=35.0, imbalance=0.0); RegionReplicaHostCostFunction : (not needed); RegionReplicaRackCostFunction : (not needed); ReadRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); WriteRequestCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); MemStoreSizeCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); StoreFileCostFunction : (multiplier=5.0, imbalance=0.0); 
2023-07-12 15:01:10,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.BaseLoadBalancer(1082): slop=0.0, systemTablesOnMaster=false
2023-07-12 15:01:10,191 INFO  [Time-limited test] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer(253): Loaded config; maxSteps=1000000, runMaxSteps=false, stepsPerRegion=800, maxRunningTime=30000, isByTable=false, CostFunctions=[RegionCountSkewCostFunction, PrimaryRegionCountSkewCostFunction, MoveCostFunction, RackLocalityCostFunction, TableSkewCostFunction, RegionReplicaHostCostFunction, RegionReplicaRackCostFunction, ReadRequestCostFunction, WriteRequestCostFunction, MemStoreSizeCostFunction, StoreFileCostFunction] , sum of multiplier of cost functions = 577.0 etc.
2023-07-12 15:01:10,201 INFO  [Time-limited test] hbase.ResourceChecker(175): after: master.balancer.TestBalancerDecision#testBalancerDecisions Thread=13 (was 12)
Potentially hanging thread: Time-limited test.slowlog.append-pool-0
	sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
	java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:47)
	com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:56)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.processEvents(BatchEventProcessor.java:159)
	com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:125)
	java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:750)
 - Thread LEAK? -, OpenFileDescriptor=263 (was 263), MaxFileDescriptor=60000 (was 60000), SystemLoadAverage=193 (was 152) - SystemLoadAverage LEAK? -, ProcessCount=161 (was 160) - ProcessCount LEAK? -, AvailableMemoryMB=8114 (was 8726)